Organic solar cells or organic photovoltaics (OPV) based on conjugated
polymers (e.g., poly-3-hexylthiophene, P3HT) and fullerene derivatives (e.g.,
[6,6]-phenyl C61 butyric acid methyl ester, PCBM) have attracted attention over
the past decades because they may provide a cost-effective route to wide use of
solar energy for electrical power generation1-3.
These organic semiconductors have the advantage of being chemically flexible
for material modifications, as well as mechanically flexible for the prospective
of low-cost, large scale processing such as screen-printing or spraying on
flexible substrates. The world's next generation of microelectronics may be
dominated by "plastic electronics" and organic solar cells are expected to play
an important role in these future technologies. Figure 1 shows a conceptual
drawing of flexible OPV array (upper panel) and the actual device on PET
substrate (lower panel)4.
|
|
Figure 1. Conceptual
drawing of flexible OPV array (upper panel) and the actual device on PET
substrate (lower panel) |
The photovoltaic process in organic solar cell devices consists of four
successive processes: light absorption, exciton dissociation, charge transport,
and charge collection: absorption of a photon creates an exciton (bounded
electron-hole pair). The exciton diffuses to the interface of two different
components, where exciton dissociation or charge separation occurs, followed by
positive charges (holes) moving to the anodes and negative charges (electrons)
to the cathode. Figure 2 demonstrates how electricity is generated in OPV
device.
|
|
Figure 2. How
electricity is generated in organic photovoltaics (OPV) device.
|
Several parameters determine the performance of a solar cell, namely, the
open-circuit voltage (Voc), short-circuit current
(Isc), and the so-called fill factor (FF). The overall power
conversion efficiency η is defined as η =
(FF)•(IscVoc)/Pm. Over the past decade,
OPV efficiency has been significantly improved to over 5% in single cell3,5 and 1% in submodules5, owing to a better understanding of device physics,
optimization of device engineering and developments of new materials2,3,6.
However, most of such OPV devices are developed in laboratories with
fabrication process involving spin-coating for photoactive layer and the use of
high vacuum to deposit the cathode. This conventional technique limits the real
potential of OPV in commercial market: low-cost manufacturing, solution
processable and high production rate7.
Recently, world-wide research efforts have been on developing transparent
contact based on modified poly (3,4ethylenedioxythiophene): poly
(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) solution8. For large
scale production, screen printing9, ink-jet
printing10 and spraying11 have been demonstrated mostly in OPV single
cells.
Organic Semitransparent Photovoltaic Energy Converter or abbreviated as OSPEC
is a novelty since it combines three features of OPV: solution processable,
vacuum free and large-scale compatible. OSPEC utilizes a special spray technique
developed by researchers in Nanostructure Optoelectronics Lab in USF, partnering with New
Energy Technologies, Inc and Florida High Tech Corridor, to fabricate OPV
modules with transparent contacts12. Figure 3a
shows a working OSPEC array, and 3b is its current-voltage characteristics. The
overall power conversion efficiency is 0.42% under 1 sun irradiance.
|
|
Figure 3. (a) Working
OSPEC array, (b) its current-voltage characteristics.
|
OSPEC is a 'green' solution for today's energy needs. It has various
applications particularly in building integrated photovoltaic products. Most
conventional solar cells are made up of silicon wafers, a brittle opaque
substance that limits how they can be used. For instance, on window technology
where transparency is a key issue, OSPEC can be made semitransparent; further
more, OSPEC performs better than silicon solar cells under ambient light13, which offers new opportunities for indoor applications.
Reference
1. G. Yu, J. Gao, J. C. Hummelen, F.
Wudl, and A. J. Heeger, Science 270, 1789 (1995).
2. S. E. Shaheen, C. J. Brabec, N. S. Sariciftci, F. Padinger, T.
Fromherz, and J. C. Hummelen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 841 (2001).
3. 15W. Ma, C. Yang, X. Gong, K. Lee, and A.
J. Heeger, Adv. Funct. Mater. 15, 1617 (2005).
4. J. Lewis, J.
Zhang and X. Jiang, Fabrication of organic solar array for applications in
microelectromechanical systems, Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy 1,
Vol. 1 (2009).
5. Martin A. Green, Keith Emery, Y. Hishikawa
and W. Warta, Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 2008; 16:435-440, Solar Cell
Efficiency Tables (Version 32),
6. Y. Liang, Y. Wu, D. Feng,
S. Tsai, H. Son, G. Li, and L. Yu, Development of New Semiconducting Polymers
for High Performance Solar Cells, J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2009, 131, 56-57.
7. F.C. Krebs "Fabrication and processing of polymer solar cells: A
review of printing and coating techniques" Solar Energy Materials & Solar
Cells 93 (2009) 394-412
8. Huang et.al. Adv. Mater. 20, 415,
2008,
9. Shaheen et.al. APL 79, 2996, 2001
10. T. Aernouts,a_ T. Aleksandrov, C. Girotto, J. Genoe, and J.
Poortmans, Polymer based organic solar cells using ink-jet printed active
layers, APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS 92, 033306 (2008)
11. Lim
et.al. APL. 93, 193301, 2008
12. US provisional patent #
12/630,398.
13. X.Jiang et.al., unpublished work; Proc. Of
IEEE, Vol 93, No.8, 1429(2005); A.Jäger-Waldau,'PV status report 2003' Institute
for environment and sustainability, Eur. Commission, 2003
Copyright AZoNano.com, Professor Xiaomei Jiang (University of
South Florida)