Editorial Feature

How Does Nanotechnology Improve Chromatographic Columns?

Image Credits: g/Ropisme/shutterstock.com

Chromatography is an analytical technique that is used to separate mixtures by distributing the components of a mixture between a stationary phase and a mobile phase. Columns are used in various types of chromatography, but improvements in nanotechnology have been focussed around liquid chromatography (LC) and gas chromatography (GC).

Nanomaterials are defined as those that are less than 100nm in size. Traditional high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) uses particles that are micrometres in diameter, but the pore size is in nanometres. In GC, the film thickness of the stationary phase in capillary columns ranges from micrometres to nanometres in size.

The idea of miniaturisation for gas chromatography has been around since the 1950s and for liquid chromatography since the 1960s. Nano-LC was first introduced in 1988 and the idea of chip based and microelectromechanical systems for gas chromatography columns is currently improving the way we use GC.

Liquid Chromatography

Liquid chromatography separates components in a mixture using a liquid mobile phase and solid column stationary phase. Whilst column chromatography has been around since the early 1900s, it wasn’t until high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was invented in the 1960s that faster separations that no longer took hours became possible.

The mode of HPLC and the columns used depends on the polarity of the analyte of interest. Two of the most common modes are normal and reverse phase chromatography. Normal phase uses a polar silica based stationary phase, whereas reverse phase chromatography uses non-polar modified silica columns such as C8 or C18.

Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) is a method of liquid chromatography first introduced by Waters in 2004, and it gives a better resolution and efficiency due to the different columns and instrumentation used. Traditional HPLC columns are typically 4.6 mm and between 150 to 250 mm in length, whereas UHPLC columns are a lot shorter with smaller sub-2-micron particles. Due to the high pressures in UHPLC, separate instrumentation is also required. An alternate to UHPLC are the fused core particle columns, which allows the use of HPLC systems at twice the speed and efficiency of traditional columns whilst being at half the backpressure of sub-2-micron columns.

Fast separation and good resolution are key factors for laboratories using liquid chromatography, so ways to improve the columns and instrumentation being used such as nano-LC is an area of research that has been of great importance over the past decade.

Gas Chromatography

Gas chromatography is a technique that is used to separate thermally stable volatile compounds within a mixture. It works by using differential migration of a sample through a column containing a solid or liquid stationary phase by a gaseous mobile phase.

The columns are either long capillary columns with the stationary phase coated on the inside of the wall, or shorter columns with a larger diameter that are packed with a particulate stationary phase. The movement of the compounds through a column is dependent upon their distribution ratios, which are inversely proportional to their volatilities.

Most GC applications use capillary columns, with wall coated open tubular columns (WCOT) being the most popular option due to their high resolution and efficiency. Miniaturisation of gas chromatography systems and columns using chip-based systems and microelectromechanical systems is allowing for faster analysis of volatile compounds with GC.

Column Chromatography Theory

The diameter of the column, particle size and pore size all affect the efficiency and speed of separation. Efficiency of a column is based on chromatography plate theory, where height is equivalent to a theoretical plate (HETP). The smaller the HETP number, the more efficient a column is. The theoretical plates can be calculated for both gas and liquid chromatography using the Van Deemter equation, which is:

H= A + B/u + Cu

  H= height is equivalent to a theoretical plate (HETP)

  A = Eddy-diffusion parameter

  B = longitudinal diffusion

  C = coefficient for mass transfer

  u = Linear Velocity

Nano-LC

Nano-LC is an alternative to traditional liquid chromatography that is still being explored. The columns in nano-LC are between 10–100 µm in diameter compared to the larger columns used in micro-LC and capillary-LC, and the flow rates are in nanoliters.

With nano-LC, with Van Deemter equation can still be applied, but there is also a separate equation to consider due to the reduction in the column diameter resulting in a reduced amount of chromatographic dilution. As a result, the sample is more concented when it is injected on to the LC system. Chromatographic dilution is defined by:

Where:

D = Dilution
Co = Initial concentration of analyte
Cmax = final concentration of analyte
ε = total porosity of the column
r = column radius
L = column length
Vinj = sample injection volume
K= retention factor
H = column plate height

Nano-LC columns are generally 75 µm in diameter to provide a compromise between sensitivity, robustness and loadability, and the particle sizes for packed nano columns are between 3 and 5µm. The alternative to the packed columns is monolith columns, where a porous structure is formed throughout the column and is fixed to the column wall.

Nano-LC offers the benefits of working as a miniaturized LC system but with UHPLC capabilities. The decreased size in nano-LC allows for an increased sensitivity and the fact that nano-LC keeps the sample concentrated means more sample is delivered to the detector. Nano-LC also has a more efficient ionization of the sample when coupled with mass spectrometry, due to the decrease in flow rate meaning there is no need for the nebulization gas used in traditional liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. A lower flow rate also means that less solvent is needed for analysis.

Nano-LC can be used for all the same types of analysis as other LC systems such as proteomics, forensic and drugs analysis, but it has been a big development for proteomic analysis due to the sensitivity it provides.

A major disadvantage to nano-LC is like UHPLC when it first came around, the equipment to be able to use nano-LC is still very expensive. There is also a poor range of columns to choose from compared to traditional LC.

Microelectromechanical Systems (MEMS) and Gas Chromatography

Gas chromatography columns can be miniaturised using microfabrication techniques. Traditional GCs have conventional silica or stainless-steel columns with an immobilized or a cross-linked stationary phase bound to the walls. Miniaturized GC and planar columns etch channels into a substrate instead of by using capillaries.

Channels can be easily etched into silicon and glass chips, but the stationary phase then needs to be fabricated inside the channel under conditions of extreme miniaturization. Fabrication methods for MEMS include using polymer coatings, carbon nanotubes, gold nanoparticle layers and ionic liquids. The performance of MEM based systems is then theorised based on the Van Deemter equation.

MEMS consume less power and allow for very narrow widths that improves separation efficiency. The potential to make micro-gas chromatographs mobile is advantageous for many fields, including analytical chemistry, environmental analysis, defence and the food industry.

Chip-Scale Gas Chromatography

A miniaturized GC (µGC) has three important components, which are the injector, a micromachined column and a single detector. A chip-scale GC system has been developed that combines all three of these components on to a single chip.

The chip scale GCs have loading times of only a few seconds and analysis can be performed in less than a minute over a wide range of boiling points. It is good for rapid analysis of compounds in real-time situations and has a low fabrication cost.

Sources and Further Reading

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

Louise Saul

Written by

Louise Saul

Louise pursued her passion for science by studying for a BSc (Hons) Biochemistry degree at Sheffield Hallam University, where she gained a first class degree. She has since gained a M.Sc. by research and has worked in a number of scientific organizations.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Saul, Louise. (2019, August 07). How Does Nanotechnology Improve Chromatographic Columns?. AZoNano. Retrieved on September 15, 2019 from https://www.azonano.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=5140.

  • MLA

    Saul, Louise. "How Does Nanotechnology Improve Chromatographic Columns?". AZoNano. 15 September 2019. <https://www.azonano.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=5140>.

  • Chicago

    Saul, Louise. "How Does Nanotechnology Improve Chromatographic Columns?". AZoNano. https://www.azonano.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=5140. (accessed September 15, 2019).

  • Harvard

    Saul, Louise. 2019. How Does Nanotechnology Improve Chromatographic Columns?. AZoNano, viewed 15 September 2019, https://www.azonano.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=5140.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this article?

Leave your feedback
Submit