|    Control and ownership of nanotechnology is a vital issue  for all governments and civil society because nanomaterials and processes can  be applied to virtually any manufactured good across all industry sectors. Nanotechnology refers to the  manipulation of matter at the scale of atoms and molecules, where size is  measured in billionths of meters (one nanometer = one-billionth of a meter).  Nanotech isn’t a single technology - but a range of technologies converging  at the nanoscale - including biotechnology, genomics, neurosciences, robotics  and information technologies.   Investment in  Nanotechnology - How Many Companies Are Involved and How Much Money is Being  Invested?  Worldwide, industry and governments invested more than $10  billion in nanotech R&D last year, with two-thirds coming from corporate  and private funds. There are an estimated 1200 nanotech start-up companies,  half of which are US-based. Virtually all Fortune 500 companies invest in  nanotech R&D. A recent survey conducted by MIT’s ‘Technology Review’ predicts that products involving nanotech  will account for over $100 billion by 2008; the US government predicts that  the nanotech market will explode to $1 trillion by 2012.    The Importance of  Patenting in Determining the Future of Nanotechnology  Intellectual property (IP) will play a major role in  deciding who will capture nanotech’s trillion dollar market, who will have  access to nanoscale technologies and at what price. At stake is control over  innovations that span multiple industry sectors - from electronics, energy,  mining and defense to new materials, pharmaceuticals and agriculture. As the ‘Wall Street Journal’ put it,  “companies that hold pioneering patents could potentially put up tolls on  entire industries.”   What Has Been  Happening in the World of Nanotechnology Patenting?  Even industry insiders admit that current intellectual  property trends related to nanotech are chaotic. Many broad patents on  nanotech-related materials, tools and processes have been granted too early  and too often. In 2002, the US-based industry trade group, Nanotechnology  Business Alliance, was already warning in testimony before the US Congress,  “…several early nanotech patents are given such broad coverage, the industry  is potentially in real danger of experiencing unnecessary legal  slowdowns.”     Could the Patenting  Situation Hamper the Development of Nanotechnology?  More recently, nanotech industry analysts observe that the  “euphoria for patenting” in the US combined with the US Patent &  Trademark Office’s inability to handle a flood of patent applications has  resulted in “the rejection of valid claims, the issuance of broad and  over-lapping claims, and a fragmented and somewhat chaotic IP landscape.” The  writers warn, “These IP roadblocks could severely retard development of  nanotechnology.”      Note: A  complete set of references can be found by referring to the original document.        |