Design for Micromanufacturability

Aditya Das, Rakesh Murthy and Harry Stephanou, Automation & Robotics Research Institute, The University of Texas at Arlington
Corresponding author:[email protected]


Assembly, packaging, and testing activities account for 85% of the cost of many microsystems. This is primarily due to the lack of backend standards or general methodology. This presentation focuses on concurrent microengineering and the need for designing for micromanufacturability. Specifically, how to design a microsystem so that it can be assembled, packaged, and tested with high yield, low cost, and short cycle time with low volume automation. The goal is for the product to be designed concurrently with the fabrication process and the assembly work cell. Special attention is devoted to tolerance analysis, error propagation, and their impact on product performance. We present a rigorous mathematical framework and its implementation into a software tool that allows the designer to rapidly evaluate tradeoffs among cost, cycle time, and yield. We will illustrate how The Texas Microfactory™ is using this unique proprietary tool for pilot production of complex microsystems.


Recently, increasing market inclination towards low-cost portable systems with complex functionality has opened up great avenues for miniaturization technology. Unlike the past surface-micromachined and monolithically fabricated MEMS products, newer microsystems have significantly grown in design complexity as well as material heterogeneity. In order to address these issues, alternative production technologies are being investigated rigorously. Assembly in micro-domain is a pioneering concept that sets new paradigms for manufacturing of robust, low-cost, and mass-producible microsystems. This is achieved through simple designing of heterogeneous micro-components followed by precise manipulation and assembly of these components to construct the envisaged complex system.

However, assembly based manufacturing of microsystems poses several unique challenges due to certain intrinsic reasons such as unavailability of standards for component design and fabrication, stringent tolerance budgets, workspace constraints, and surface effects due to scaling. Consequently, selectivity of manipulation systems, sensors, control schemes, and automation can result in a significantly large number of iterations in establishing the production cycle for an acceptable yield, which renders the manufacturing process hugely expensive and time consuming.

At ARRI's Texas Microfactory™, we exercise a holistic approach towards microscale manufacturing where, using a complex mathematical framework, different aspects in pilot production are evaluated concurrently to estimate the cost functions such as yield, throughput, cost, and performance. Using an indigenously developed iterative software tool, an acceptable combination for these cost functions is searched for and the corresponding input parameters are selected for the manufacturing process.


Figure 1. ARRI's microspectrometer consisting of Silicon MEMS parts, glass ball lenses and beamsplitter cube, IC laser source and detector integrated on 1cmx1cm silicon die with device resolution of 5nm for visible wavelength and 25nm for near infrared wavelength.

Table 1: Cost function comparison for microspectrometer manufacturing

Projections for a pure open loop control based assembly
Projections for a pure closed loop control based assembly
Projections for a custom designed hybrid control scheme
Overall Yield
Cycle time
6 - 10 minutes
50 - 80 minutes
20 - 35 minutes
Sensors requirement


Figure 2. Snapshots of the software tools for design for micromanufacturability: (top) manufacturing cost function estimator, (bottom) process simulator in virtual 3D.


Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.


Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    MANCEF. (2022, September 09). Design for Micromanufacturability. AZoNano. Retrieved on June 02, 2023 from

  • MLA

    MANCEF. "Design for Micromanufacturability". AZoNano. 02 June 2023. <>.

  • Chicago

    MANCEF. "Design for Micromanufacturability". AZoNano. (accessed June 02, 2023).

  • Harvard

    MANCEF. 2022. Design for Micromanufacturability. AZoNano, viewed 02 June 2023,

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this article?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type