New Analysis on Emerging Trends in Nanolithography

Research and Markets has announced the addition of Frost & Sullivan's new report "Nanolithography - Emerging Trends" to their offering.

This study pertains to the semiconductor manufacturing sector wherein it provides insight into emerging trends and research and development in the area of nanolithography

This Frost & Sullivan research service titled Nanolithography--Emerging Trends provides an insight into the developments in next-generation lithography tools. The study focuses mainly on the semiconductor market, which has the highest requirement for resolution and cost. In this research, Frost & Sullivan's expert analysts thoroughly examine the following technologies: extreme ultraviolet lithography (EUVL), direct electron beam writing, and nanoimprinting.

Technology Overview

Direction of Technology Progression to Fill the Gap in Next-generation Semiconductor Lithography

In accordance with Moores Law, continuous advancements have characterized the evolution of the semiconductor industry. Development has been fast paced, with sizes of transistors shrinking by 50 percent every one to two years. The issue of technical limitations hindering Moores Law has been widely discussed since the beginning of the decade. Technologies capable of brining semiconductors to the fore provide great opportunities for chip manufacturers, as well as other participants along the supply chain. Radical changes are afoot in the semiconductor fabrication technology, owing to the approaching resolution limits. The lifespan of existing photolithography has been extended several times, introducing additional process steps to be aligned with Moores Law, notes Technical Insights Research Analyst Kenneth Chua. Stepping forward, significant changes in technology will be required and the most promising being extreme ultraviolet photolithography, using light sources of significantly shorter wavelength. To put it mildly, prime technology choices for next-generation lithography have a track record of being uncertain. Prioritization of technology in the past is vastly different in the current landscape. The high degree of complexity brings about many potential blocking points for a technology. As such, there is a need for stakeholders and investors to understand the underlying forces, advantages, and disadvantages linked with each technology to better predict future directions of its growth. Extreme ultraviolet (EUV), which is the prime candidate for next-generation lithography, is faced with very high complexity levels. Unlike in the past, there is a growing need for technology integration between different disciplines engineering, chemistry, physics, and nuclear science. Moving to next-generation semiconductor lithography tools involves a high degree of complexity. However, these challenges can be addressed by an industry known to solve complex technical challenges. Transition of such radical changes to mass production promises a great deal of excitement to both innovators as well as common spectators.

Additionally incurred processes (and cost) due to double patterning on current photolithography equipment underpin the increasing importance of next generation tools. While the technology has experienced numerous delays in the development cycle, the promise is just too big for chip makers not cash in on it. Early adopters successfully implementing the technology are expected to experience improved cost effectiveness as well as product differentiation. The statement is especially true in an industry where technology leadership carries a big premium and advantage in moving forward along the learning curve Until the successful transition of EUV gets underway, computational lithography features a growing demand for chip makers to fabricate dense chips using existing photolithography tools. Highly technical demands for next-generation tools drive the need for research partnerships to a new level. Several initiatives driven by SEMATECH are already in place at present, particularly in the area of mask inspection, which has the potential to be a show-stopper for EUV. Alternative technologies such as parallel e-beam and nanoimprinting should not be written-off. says the analyst. Given the degree of complexity, there is always a possibility of EUV encountering blocking points and scientific limitations.

Market Sectors

Expert Frost & Sullivan analysts thoroughly examine the following market sectors in this research:

  • EUVL
  • Direct electron beam writing
  • Nanoimprinting
  • Technologies

The following technologies are covered in this research:

  • Wafer fabrication
  • Lithography

Key Topics Covered:

  1. Executive Summary
  2. Strategic Assessment of Industry Environment
  3. Industry Best Practices and Strategic Insights
  4. Appendix
  5. Decision Support Database

Source: http://www.researchandmarkets.com/

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this news story?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.