Posted in | News | Nanoenergy

Low-Cost Nanocoating Helps Solar Ponds Produce More Fresh Water

*Important notice: This news reports on a paper which has been accepted and is awaiting peer review. Scientific Reports sometimes publishes preliminary scientific reports that are not peer-reviewed and, therefore, should not be regarded as conclusive or treated as established information.

A nano-ferric oxide (Fe2O3) coating applied to the base of a solar desalination pond increased water temperatures and freshwater output in outdoor, season-spanning trials, according to a new Scientific Reports study.

Salt Field in Daebudo Island, South Korea Study: Experimental and theoretical investigation of industrial solar desalination ponds enhanced with nano-ferric oxide for sustainable freshwater production. Image Credit: photo_jeongh/Shutterstock.com

Want to read this later? Click here to download a PDF!

Solar desalination ponds are attractive for off-grid water production because they can be simpler to operate than conventional solar stills and can store more heat.

Researchers have tested many efficiency tweaks: better absorbers, different geometries, and various nanomaterials, but long-duration outdoor validation paired with energy-exergy analysis and a detailed heat-and-mass transfer model has been limited.

Fe2O3 is particularly interesting as it is relatively cheap, chemically stable in saline conditions, and considered environmentally compatible.

Steel Based vs Fe2O3 Coated Performance

The researchers ran two identically sized solar desalination ponds side by side: a conventional unit with a steel base and an enhanced unit with a Fe2O3 nanostructured bottom coating.

Each pond had a 1 m2 active surface area and a 30 cm brine depth, installed at a 36° tilt (matching Tehran’s latitude) to optimise solar exposure. Both were set within insulated wooden frames and covered with a transparent glass lid to support condensation and reduce heat loss (the paper reports 5 mm glass in the setup description and 4 mm in the materials table).

Synthetic seawater was prepared using Persian Gulf salt, and measurements were taken from 06:00 to 18:00 across representative days in each season, with repeated runs and statistical testing to support the comparisons.

Note on terminology: while the paper sometimes refers to Fe2O3 “nanoplates,” microscopy results describe a predominantly nanoparticle coating.

How The Coating Was Made And Verified

The Fe2O3 nanoplates were synthesised via chemical precipitation using ferric chloride and ammonium hydroxide, then washed to remove impurities.

Characterisation using SEM, TEM, XRD, and BET indicated an average crystallite size of about 32 nm and a mesoporous structure with a high surface area of 82.6 m2/g. These properties are intended to improve solar absorption and heat transfer at the base of the pond.

What Changed In Performance

Across the outdoor trials, the enhanced pond reached a higher peak brine temperature of 74 °C, compared with 68 °C for the conventional pond, an increase of roughly 8-9 %.

Freshwater production also rose: maximum daily productivity increased from 5.1 to 6.5 L/m2/day, a 27.4 % gain. Under peak summer irradiance, the authors also report hourly productivity increases of up to about 60 %, pointing to stronger benefits when sunlight is most intense.

The paper links the improvements to higher absorptivity and reduced reflection at the base, improved heat transfer through the coated layer, and heat localisation that can help limit downward conductive losses.

Energy And Exergy: A Clearer Picture Of Efficiency

The team quantified performance beyond yield, looking at both energy and exergy metrics. Maximum thermal efficiency increased from 0.41 to 0.53, while maximum exergy efficiency rose from 5.9 % to 7.8 %. 

The paper emphasises that absolute exergy efficiency remains modest because major losses and irreversibilities, especially at the glass cover and during evaporation-condensation, still dominate the system’s thermodynamic behaviour.

A coupled heat-and-mass transfer model was developed under quasi-steady assumptions and validated against the outdoor measurements.

The study reports a strong match between predicted and observed behaviour, including an R2 of about 0.985 and a root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) of 0.18 L/m2/day for distillate yield; related tabulated metrics include RMSE/MAE values for yield and temperature predictions.

Practical Considerations And Next Steps

In their study, the authors show that Fe2O3 has a useful cost-performance balance (cited at roughly 5–15 USD/kg) compared with other enhancement approaches. They note the solid bottom-coating format is intended to reduce risks associated with dispersed nanoparticles; no visible coating deterioration was reported during the test period.

At the same time, the paper calls for dedicated leaching analysis and longer-duration durability studies, including the impact of salt deposition/fouling and location-specific environmental factors such as humidity and dust.

The modelling framework could also be extended with transient formulations to better capture thermal storage effects, and the setup could be explored in hybrid configurations (for example, with external condensers or phase change materials).

Journal Reference

Farahbod F. et al. (2026). Experimental and theoretical investigation of industrial solar desalination ponds enhanced with nano-ferric oxide for sustainable freshwater production. Scientific Reports. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-41095-0

Dr. Noopur Jain

Written by

Dr. Noopur Jain

Dr. Noopur Jain is an accomplished Scientific Writer based in the city of New Delhi, India. With a Ph.D. in Materials Science, she brings a depth of knowledge and experience in electron microscopy, catalysis, and soft materials. Her scientific publishing record is a testament to her dedication and expertise in the field. Additionally, she has hands-on experience in the field of chemical formulations, microscopy technique development and statistical analysis.    

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Jain, Noopur. (2026, February 25). Low-Cost Nanocoating Helps Solar Ponds Produce More Fresh Water. AZoNano. Retrieved on February 25, 2026 from https://www.azonano.com/news.aspx?newsID=41633.

  • MLA

    Jain, Noopur. "Low-Cost Nanocoating Helps Solar Ponds Produce More Fresh Water". AZoNano. 25 February 2026. <https://www.azonano.com/news.aspx?newsID=41633>.

  • Chicago

    Jain, Noopur. "Low-Cost Nanocoating Helps Solar Ponds Produce More Fresh Water". AZoNano. https://www.azonano.com/news.aspx?newsID=41633. (accessed February 25, 2026).

  • Harvard

    Jain, Noopur. 2026. Low-Cost Nanocoating Helps Solar Ponds Produce More Fresh Water. AZoNano, viewed 25 February 2026, https://www.azonano.com/news.aspx?newsID=41633.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this news story?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.