Jun 22 2009
Too tiny to see or touch, manmade nanoparticles are increasingly becoming 
  a by-product of industry and chemical and pharmaceutical technology. But once 
  these super small materials enter the water supply, do they reach coastal areas 
  and enter salt marshes and tidal zones, where shellfish and finfish grow?
Researchers at the University 
  of South Carolina's Nanocenter, working with scientists at the National 
  Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in Charleston, examined whether gold 
  nanorods could readily pass from water to the marine food web.
Their findings, published in this week's edition of Nature Nanotechnology, 
  suggest that nanoparticles move easily into the marine food web and are absorbed 
  in marsh grasses, trapped in biofilms and consumed by filter feeders, such as 
  clams. "This is the first study to report on the fate of gold nanoparticles 
  in a complex ecosystem containing sediments, biofilms, grasses, microscopic 
  organisms, filter feeders and omnivores," said environmental chemist Dr. 
  John L. Ferry of the University of South Carolina.
The gold nanorods - rod-shaped nanomaterials that have applications for medicine 
  and even adding color to stained glass - were used for this study because of 
  their ability to be traced, he said.
For the study, scientists at the Coastal Center for Environmental Health and 
  Biomolecular Research (CCEHBR), one of NOAA's National Centers for Coastal Ocean 
  Science, created three estuarine mesocosms, which are experimental enclosures 
  replicating a coastal estuarine ecosystem. NOAA scientists constructed a tidal 
  marsh creek, containing natural, unfiltered water from Wadmalaw Island; planted 
  Spartina grass in sediments; and added clams, mud snails and grass shrimp. The 
  gold nanorods were synthesized by researchers at the University of South Carolina 
  and introduced into the ecosystems. At the end of the experiment, the university 
  team developed the techniques necessary to measure the transport of the nanoparticles 
  and found that clams and biofilms accumulated the most.
"As the first study to examine the fate and effects of nanoparticles in 
  marine ecosystems, we really didn’t know what to expect," said Dr. 
  Geoff Scott, the CCEHBR director, who collaborated with Drs. Michael Fulton 
  and Paul Pennington, environmental toxicologists at the CCEHBR.
"This study enabled us to understand how these nanomaterials were transported 
  and distributed through the ecosystem," he said. "One significant 
  finding is that bivalve shellfish, such as clams, accumulated a significant 
  amount of the nanomaterial." The research has implications for all coastal 
  environments and will provide a baseline for future studies on the environmental 
  impact of nanomaterials, Scott said.
The study is significant because it shows that manmade nanoparticles can enter 
  the estuarine food and ultimately could find their way into the shellfish and 
  fish that humans eat, said Ferry.
"This study is a road map for where we go next," he said. "We 
  did not look at what happens 'up the food chain.'" Dr. Thomas Vogt, director 
  of the university's Nanocenter, said, "This landmark study points toward 
  things to come in the near future when we enlarge our national and international 
  R&D footprint even more by developing the recently endowed Center of Economic 
  Excellence for Nanoenvironmental Research and Risk Assessment."